The U.S. and Israel’s Joint attack on the Sovereign Nation of Iran stands as a Stark Injustice

 It appears that Israel deftly manipulated the U.S. President and Israeli Lobby into taking this unwise action, even though Israel is equipped with nuclear weapons while Iran has none.

Dr. Pamelia Riviere 

NOAM CHOMSKY: Well, the striking aspect of this is the chutzpah involved. I mean, Israel has had nuclear weapons for probably 50 years or 40 years. They have, estimates are, maybe 100, 200 nuclear weapons. And they are an aggressive state. Israel has invaded Lebanon five times. It’s carrying out an illegal occupation that carries out brutal attacks like Gaza last summer. And they have nuclear weapons. But the main story is that if—incidentally, the Mossad analysis corresponds to U.S. intelligence analysis. They don’t know if Iran is developing nuclear weapons. But I think the crucial fact is that even if they were, what would it mean? It would be just as U.S. intelligence analyzes it: It would be part of a deterrent strategy. They couldn’t use a nuclear weapon. They couldn’t even threaten to use it. Israel, on the other hand, can; has, in fact, threatened the use of nuclear weapons a number of times.The U.S. and Israel have initiated an unjustified assault on Iran, the so-called Epic Fury Operation, targeting locations throughout the nation, including the residence of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, on Saturday morning. This Trump-Netanyahu war is unconstitutional and violates international law, says Bernie Sanders.

 For decades, the United States and Israel have expressed deep concerns about Iran's escalating nuclear enrichment and missile development, viewing these advancements as significant threats to their security. In a thought-provoking interview with Democracy Now! on March 2, 2015, renowned intellectual Noam Chomsky made a compelling case against the nuclear deal and attack plan on Iran. He argued that the true aim behind Israel's opposition to the Iran Nuclear Deal goes “beyond mere survival—it's a pursuit of regional dominance”. Chomsky’s insights challenge us to reconsider the motivations behind the rhetoric and actions of these powerful allies.

A Big Lie Killed Innocent Iranian Elementary School Children: Iran is a Threat to the US 

According to an Al Jazeera report on Saturday, 28, 2026, at approximately 9:27 am (06:27 GMT), the semi-official Fars news agency reported a series of explosions in Tehran, the Iranian capital. 

The National Security Council of Iran has urged residents to evacuate Tehran amid concerns of a potential escalation. A shocking deception led to the tragic deaths of innocent Iranian elementary school children: Iran emerges as a formidable threat to the US. It is a big lie. 

In Minab, a southern city, an Israeli strike targeted two schools that include one elementary girls’ school, resulting in the deaths of at least 108 individuals and 63 wounded, according to state media. Missiles struck multiple locations in Tehran, including areas housing key government ministries and military installations. Reports from Iranian media indicate that strikes targeted the Ministry of Intelligence, the Ministry of Defence, the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, and the Parchin military complex. 

The Fars News Agency stated that several missiles also impacted University Street and the Jomhouri area of the capital. Mehr News Agency reported that at least two students lost their lives in an assault on a school situated east of the capital. 

According to the Guardian, Israeli jets and US missiles targeted numerous sites throughout Iran, causing residents to panic and flee from major urban areas. Targeting included Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khameini, as well as Iran’s president, Masoud Pezeshkian, along with various weapons facilities across the nation. Israel declared the launch of what it referred to as Operation Lion’s Roar, coordinated with Trump, which an Israeli military official stated aimed at “degrading the regime’s capabilities.” 

The Israeli official further commented that operations would persist “for as long as necessary.” Hundreds of attacks struck a minimum of 14 cities in Iran, which an Israeli military official described as a significantly broader operation compared to the previous US-Israeli assault on Iran during the 12-day conflict last summer. The strikes targeted intelligence and security headquarters, residences of Iranian officials, as well as ballistic missile launchers and storage – a strategy designed to diminish Iran’s capacity to retaliate against the US and Israeli strikes. 

Who Prompted the War, Netanyahu or Trump? 

The question arises as to who played a significant role in provoking former President Trump to pursue military action and regime change plans in Iran on two separate occasions. This situation prompts further inquiries into the influence of foreign leaders, particularly that of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. If Netanyahu is indeed a key figure in this dynamic, it raises troubling implications regarding the independence of U.S. Presidents in making foreign policy decisions. What underlying factors contribute to this perceived pressure from Israel? Are there historical alliances, strategic interests, or geopolitical considerations at play that compel American leadership to align closely with Israeli perspectives? Understanding these complexities is essential to grasping the broader context of U.S.-Israel relations and their impact on American foreign policy decisions in the Middle East.

Trump’s Contradictory View: Attacking a Sovereign Country and Regime Change 

The recent joint US-Israel operation targeting Iran raises serious legal and moral questions. The strategy to eliminate key Iranian leaders, including President Masoud Pezeshkian, a reformer, and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, appears not only unjustifiable but also deeply troubling. This proposed annihilation plan reflects a reckless disregard for human life and sovereignty.

President Donald Trump's foreign policy in his second term has become increasingly militaristic, with actions such as claiming territories and launching strikes on multiple countries. In 2025, he executed strikes in seven countries and reinstated policies for deposing leaders, notably in Venezuela. His campaign against Iran marks a significant escalation, described as a “massive and ongoing” military operation alongside Israel, with a stated goal of regime change. Trump claims to seek freedom for the Iranian people, but his actions appear contradictory to previous promises made to the American public.

CNN reported that Trump's 2024 campaign contradicts previous statements about regime change in Iran. - Trump's team warned that voting for Kamala Harris could lead to wars. - Trump positioned himself as the "peace candidate" during the 2016 election. - He criticized Hillary Clinton as a "trigger-happy" hawk regarding war in Iraq. - Trump called for abandoning nation-building and regime change policies during the 2016 Republican National Convention. 

Iran’s Attack in Retaliation

Iranian forces have reportedly struck a US naval base in Bahrain in retaliation for attacks by the US and Israel. The UAE, Qatar, and Kuwait have intercepted missiles aimed at US military bases, including the al-Udeid air base in Qatar. US President Donald Trump noted ongoing "major combat operations" and urged Iranian forces to disarm. Israel's defence minister announced a "pre-emptive attack" against Iran, amid escalating tensions over Iran's nuclear program.

In recent hours, the situation in Doha has remained unusually calm amidst escalating tensions in the region. Israel's ongoing military actions against targets in Iran may lead to a shift in focus for Iranian forces, possibly directing more firepower toward Israel. This marks a significant turn in the dynamics for cities within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), where Oman has remained the only country untouched by attacks throughout the day.

 Historically, cities in the GCC have enjoyed a reputation for peace, commerce, and prosperity. However, the recent events have begun to disturb this calm. Qatar, for instance, faced multiple attacks last year from Iran in response to U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites and has also been targeted in the past by Israel. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have experienced sporadic attacks, primarily linked to the ongoing conflict in Yemen, yet none have reached the intensity of the current situation. 

Recent footage emerging from Kuwait, Bahrain, Dubai, and Abu Dhabi portrays a worrying reality: the interconnected conflicts involving Israel, Iran, and the U.S., from which these cities had long been insulated, are now directly impacting their residents. The ramifications of these attacks and Iran's retaliatory measures have begun to resonate far beyond borders, signalling a significant escalation in the regional conflict, as reported by Zain Basravi for Al Jazeera. 

Reactions From the Gulf States

From the Iranian perspective, their argument is that foreign bases facilitate attacks against them, pushing them to expand the conflict to pressure the U.S. to withdraw. This situation is likely to have significant effects on the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and Iran's future relations. The perception of Iran as a threat might solidify, while the safety provided by bases could be questioned, as these bases now become targets. 

The Gulf States have condemned Iran's actions, viewing them as attacks on their sovereignty. They’ve previously sought to rebuild relations with Iran and have tried to end the conflict. However, this recent escalation may force them to reassess their ties with Iran and the U.S., especially concerning the value of having these bases. The Gulf States will likely push for negotiations to end the violence, as war isn’t a viable solution. They may find Iran in a stronger position because of the attacks it faces. Regarding U.S. military actions, future strikes will depend on the outcomes of ongoing operations and Iranian responses. If costs mount without regime change or softening of Iran’s stance, pressure will increase on the U.S. for an exit strategy. Conversely, if the U.S. escalates successfully, it may lead to a significant impact on Iran. However, both sides could be caught in a prolonged conflict beyond their expectations, as Al Jazeera noted in a podcast discussion. 

Military Intervention in Iran is Unjust

According to initial reports, joint strikes by the United States and Israel across Iran have left more than 200 people dead. In response, Tehran has launched retaliatory attacks targeting Israeli and U.S.-linked positions across the Gulf region, triggering blasts and rising tensions.

The military intervention in Iraq has been widely criticized for its unjust nature, as numerous Iraqi lives were lost due to the actions of the United States. This pattern of attacking sovereign nations has resurfaced with Iran, which is perceived by some as a fight for its survival in a challenging geopolitical landscape. 

Observers note that the U.S. has not shown sensitivity towards cultural and religious observances, such as Ramadan, in regions like Gaza and Iran. During Donald Trump's presidency, his administration faced criticism for decisions perceived as aggressive, such as sending a warship to the region. 

Many believe he was forced into a position that compelled him to demonstrate strength, especially amid scandals involving high-profile figures. Some interpret the U.S. distraction from domestic issues through a renewed focus on military engagements as a strategy to shift media attention away from these controversies. In the context of Israeli foreign policy, there are concerns that political leaders seek to expand Israeli territory at the expense of Iran. 

The silence from various Arab nations is noted as a reflection of their own challenges, leading to calls from those sympathetic to Iran for a stronger response. Furthermore, there are discussions about the future of governance in Iran, particularly regarding the theocratic regime. Many secular and democratic advocates argue for the Iranian people's right to choose their own government. 

Has the US Become a Powerless Regime, a Puppet of Israel?

While reforms have been initiated by the current Iranian President, who holds moderate views, the ongoing tension is largely a result of external pressures, including perceived threats to Iran's resources and influence in the Middle East. Prominent secular thinkers and journalists are voicing their opposition to military actions, attributing some of the U.S. Congress's support for war to lobbying by pro-Zionist groups. This has created a divide in understanding the implications of Iran's survival, with many viewing it as crucial for regional stability.

The latest news is that Trump claims that Iran’s supreme leader was killed in airstrikes that Iran denies. In a concluding remark, it could be said that the assassination of state leaders such as Raisi, Saddam, and Gaddafi could trigger similar actions against other prominent world leaders and destabilize the world. 

For the past 6 decades, since the John Fitzgerald Kennedy

assassination, US presidents have often appeared as powerless puppets of Israel, with the United States lacking influence over the Israeli Zionist Lobby. The US’s ability to shape its foreign policy and its support for Israel have diminished significantly over the years.

The U.S. military action against the sovereign nation of Iran raises serious questions of justice: it seems that Israel skillfully maneuvered the U.S. Congress into this predicament. Tomorrow will unveil the champions and the challengers in the epic showdown of the joint war, Epic Fury! Who will rise to victory and who will falter? Let the story unfold in the year 2026!

The writer is a freelance analyst.